Post by PickyChicky on Oct 7, 2014 16:07:00 GMT -6
I'm not sure how they came up with that number, but it's mentioned in the DMM's instructions for calculating dimensional weight (223.1.7.1.c and 223.1.7.2.d).
It was 166 before when they were going by the 5,184 in3 limit, so since they've reduced that to 1,728 in3, it's a good thing they raised the divisor to 194 because it reduces the dimensional weight a bit.
It was 166 before when they were going by the 5,184 in3 limit, so since they've reduced that to 1,728 in3, it's a good thing they raised the divisor to 194 because it reduces the dimensional weight a bit.
.jpg)